It must be stated right off the bat that it is not the intention of this document to attack the King James version of the bible as an entity on its own. I only oppose KJV 'onlyism' which is at its very nature, Antichrist. It is my intention though, to LAY WASTE the statements and arguments of the proponents behind a movement of "great evil" within christendom, and to expose the iniquity behind it. There is and has been for a long long time, a CULT within christianity that claims the KJV is the "true" and only "infallible" word of God. The proponents of this "cult" are found everywhere en-masse with ministries, churches, and organizations even touting "KJV ONLY" on their doctrinal and mission statements. It has become but another CREED that has been added to weed out the true from the false, BY THE FALSE in christianity, and I can assure you with 100% certainty, that this creed and movement is in fact ANTICHRIST to the core and will PROVE IT in this article. The claims of this movement are that (1) the KJV is the only RELIABLE, true and 'pure' word of God and all other bible "versions" are corrupt (2) that the KJV version was in fact the bible "RE-INSPIRED" by God (3) that the other bible versions are part of a CONSPIRACY(4) that the KJV is the only version to uphold the "divinity" of Jesus Christ. This document is to a degree 'repentance' on my behalf, for I have in the past been apart of the "KJV only" cult to a degree out of pure ignorance and the influence of mammon and its spirit. I have learned from a very thorough examination of this controversy that the KJV only position, its arguments and "proofs", are in fact in grave ERRORand the spirit behind it is Antichrist. The 'cult' and its arguments do nothing less than cause division, dissension, and dissimilitude to the Body of Christ and is in fact the true 'agenda' behind the cult and its proponents, proving that the spirit behind it is of Satan. One of the most despicable, EVIL, bigoted, disgusting works of scholarly investigation I have ever read is GAIL. A. RIPLINGERS -  NEW AGE BIBLE VERSIONS. This book ladies and gentlemen is written in the spirit of Antichrist, and "JEZEBEL" and doubt it not. The flagrant LIES and spirit of Satan to be found in its pages are so blatant, that I cannot believe there are respected christian scholars and institutions out there that uphold this toxic dribble of satanic derision and HERESY!!!. G.A. Riplinger.......A WOMEN......with absolutely no right whatsoever to even be writing such a work according to the word of God, is one of the most touted in KJV only camps. Another minion of this darkness is Dr. Peter Ruckman of the Pensacola Bible Institute. This 'quack' has a major following in KJV onlyism, whose adherents are even called "Ruckmanites" (proving the "cult" agenda of KJV onlyism). We'll examine these two in this article as we go along but we need to start with the basics. It has been argued by KJV onlyism that some of the new versions of the bible were translated by 'occultists' and 'homosexuals', and Im referring to the NIV in particular and the accusations against the panel who translated the work. Not only am I gonna show you that these claims are LIES and will prove it, they have no baring SCRIPTURALLY for a reason to denounce them as being representations of the word of God. Seeing how David and his son Solomon of the O.T., who wrote part of the bible, were guilty of MURDER, ADULTERY, and OCCULTISM, this argument purely in racial ignorance shows what "spirit" Im talking about behind this KJV only movement. Besides, I will prove with original documentation that King James himself was in fact 'homosexual', and even worse, an OCCULTIST (freemason) which boomerangs this basis for the KJV onlyism right back AGAINST THEM!!!. Not to mention James was the "HEAD" of the Church Of England.....a representative of the Roman catholic whore!!!.  For the longest time it was my own opinion that the KJV was the only version that did not step on the DEITY of Jesus Christ, and I have since that time found that position to be utterly FALSE and will show you. This document is directed towards 4 out of 5 camps of opinion within the what I call 'KJV TRAP'. These 4 camps basically comprise christendom for the most part and we should look at them.

CAMP #1: "I Just Like The KJV Best"
This group of individuals holds a preference to the KJV not based upon an academic or scholarly basis, but because of reasons such as tradition, or the rhythmic poetical style of the KJV, or a number of other factors not based upon textual criticism. These folks dont deny there are better versions or that one could be made, but just prefer the KJV. These folks are really "marginal" KJV only, who really take their position based upon the "spirit of mammon", or, 'go with the crowd'. I will not direct this document towards this camp as there position is of ignorance more than anything else, but hope those of this camp will see the light in this document.

CAMP #2: "The Textual Argument"
This group claims the greek and hebrew texts used by the KJV translators are for various reasons, "superior" to all other original language texts. They dont claim the language texts are "inspired" per say, but that they are more accurate to the original. These folks will not necessarily claim they are KJV only, but point to what they claim is the "majority text" of which they claim is the original text given, therefore they claim superiority in the KJV.

CAMP #3: "Received Text Only"
This camp will claim that the Textus Receptus or "received text" has been supernaturally preserved over time creating an "inspired" KJV version. They would not go as far to claim that the KJV is "inerrant", but feel that it is still divinely produced seeing they feel God preserved the TR for the making of the version. These folks claim a "providential" hand behind Erasmus, Stephanus,  and Beza  who created the original language texts that is the basis of the KJV.

CAMP #4: "The KJV Is Inspired"
The majority of KJV onlyism falls into this group, and believe the KJV as an english language translation is "inspired", therefore "inerrant". This camp will literally make the claim that the KJV is the "only" word of God today, and all other versions are false. To advocate contrary to this groups position on the KJV is to go against the very word of God, seeing how KJV = The word of God to these people. To point out deletion, omission and out right error to these people, brings a response of "providential change" by God, therefore error is impossible within the KJV. This camp views other translations as a "conspiracy", and are very zealous to defend their KJV cause, and are extremely destructive to the Body of Christ.

CAMP #5: "The KJV Is New Revelation"
This camp is the most radical of all. This camp really does not rely on any argument other than the KJV was the bible 're-inspired" by God in 1611, and as such, is "new revelation". These folks will literally claim that the greek and hebrew original texts should be changed to accommodate and fit the readings of the KJV if necessary!. This camp is militant and vocal and the most dangerous of all. They are quick to condemn anything contrary to their position as "Antichrist", and will even suspect demonic activity when confronted. This group literally makes the KJV a central aspect of their religious faith, and makes the KJV the only word of God, denying any and everything else.

        All 5 of these groups are in fact detrimental to the Church at large, but 4 of them impose the greatest threat and damage, so like they say in the commercial "this Bud's for you". There is an old joke running around the church that is ever so appropriate in describing the majority of these camps and it goes something like "If the KJV was good enough for Paul, its good enough for me!". This basically sums up the utter IGNORANCE of the KJV only camp, so lets start at the beginning.
        The old and new testaments are written for the most part in greek and hebrew, though there are chaldean and aramaic translations of words contained within. The 'versions' that we have today are in fact TRANSLATIONS into english or other foreign languages, in which the KJV is one of them. I will tell you right off the bat that for this reason ALONE, the KJV becomes "inferior" to the ORIGINAL language texts for our english language is CRAP in comparison to the greek and hebrew languages. Our english language is in fact a MONGROL language, a mish mash of many many dialects intermingled over centuries of time and I truly believe it is the language of modern day BABYLON!!!. The english language is a CONDENSED language, comprised of a rather simple and inadequate alphabet and vocabulary in comparison to the greek and hebrew languages. In comparison, we have one word for "LOVE" in the english, whereas the greek and hebrew languages have many words for 'love" in detailed description. We use the same word to describe love for God, wife, job, children, dog, favorite food etc. There are different words for love in greek and hebrew that describe different types of love for these various things, yet in english we only have 'one', and that without a particular clear MEANING for what love in fact is. This is the same for many other words in greek and hebrew in comparison to the english. The greek and hebrew vocabulary base is 10's of thousands of words greater than the english language, and as such are more complicated in comparison to english, and for this reason it is %100 imperative that one DIRECTLY TRANSLATES the original language words for ones self as all versions translated into english will be "INCOMPLETE" in relaying the full meaning because of the inferiority of the english language in comparison. All "versions" are in fact BIAS'S OF EYTMOLOGY, and that's what you in fact see from version to version, TRANSLATION BIAS!!!. It works like this, and here's a good example in the KJV. The translator of the original language looks at Matt.14:27 say, and translates the words from the original into english. Seeing how the KJV is touted as 'reformation' based, certain BIAS in choice of words in the eytmology comes into play here. Matt.14:27 is a prime verse for pointing out an ERROR in translation in the KJV. The word in that verse "cheer" is in fact ERROR, and should be "COURAGE"!!!. The translator in BIAS chose the word cheer in the eytmology to line up with his theological "position", and for consistency in the english. The word 'cheer" and "courage" do NOT mean the same thing in english folks, are in fact radically different, yet this is the word in the eytmology the translator chose.
 

       There were other words he could've chose in the eytmology, yet he chose this one (cheer) to remain consistent with other verses for the sake of the english language (see Acts 27:22, 27:25, 27:36 and Strong's 2114). As you can see, the majority of the meaning of this word means "COURAGE" and should've been the word used. But doesn't the word "cheer" reflect something more akin to the SAVED BY FAITH ALONE, FALSE GOSPEL? It most certainly does, and like I said, the KJV is known as being the translation of the REFORMATION in the majority of circles, especially KJV ONLYISM!!!. This type of UN-LITERAL translating is found throughout the KJV and I can cite you hundreds of such cases. In fact, I will cite you literal and PURPOSEFUL ERRANCY to prove that the KJV as a 'version' is fraught with PURPOSEFUL ERROR in numerous places. Not 'human" error, but on purpose folks and its very easily proven. There is an "omission" ladies and gentlemen that has disturbed me ever since the Holy Spirit showed me many many years ago, and is in fact found in the majority of all translations, even the KJV. Some would argue that it is not an omission at all but Paul's phraseology on how he "recited" a scripture in the old testament, yet a couple of the original language texts used for ALL our "modern" translations of which the KJV is one of them, does not have the omission. The most favorite of all verses used by the false gospel proponents, especially the "faith movement", is a direct quote by Paul from Habakkuk:
 

       Now, you may say 'so what, what's the difference?'. Well, Pauls recital of Habbakuk is missing the 'personal article'. There is a BIG difference folks. Everyone born on this planet is born with "faith". Faith is what makes the fire fighter enter a blaze. Faith is what propels the skydiver to jump out of the airplane. We are all born with faith.......BUT.......it is NOT........."HIS"FAITH.........JESUS CHRIST'S, this must be "obtained" from God himself for you do not already have it. Faith, "his" faith ONLY comes by HEARING, and that the WORD OF GOD!!!. This is not understood by the MANY in christianity, therefore they only possess there OWN faith which is BELIEF ONLY, and claim it is "HIS" (just like they do with "love"). I want you to pay careful attention to the "context" of both these verses above for they go against all the false interpretations in the whore church of Babylon. The "faith" of Jesus Christ is given in 'equal measure' to all those CALLED of the Father. This 'faith' MUST INCREASE or rather BARE FRUIT or it will be CUT ASUNDER for there is a "nasty" little requirement involved with FRUIT INCREASE which comes by way of FAITH INCREASE, and that is OBEDIENCE TO THE COMMANDS OF JESUS CHRIST!!!. Ever read your bible? Its very interesting. Jesus Christ states emphatically that he is only interested in......"MUCH" FRUIT!!!. He does not except in fact anything less.....check it out for yourself!!!. This is a "transliterated" OMISSION found in all our modern versions and is in fact a deadly theologically. This is an imperative point here because all bible "versions" are TRANSLITERATED, therefore ERROR IS 100% IMMINENT!!!. This is a rule that cannot be overturned for there is going to be extreme variance between linguistic translation.
 

       Now folks, this is what I call BLATANT TRANSLITERATION PERVERSION!!!. The KJV transliteration is purely BOGUS to the core and in fact is proving on the contrary that there is a "conspiracy" with the KJV!!!. Seeing how the "version" was produced by the Church of England and holding to the church "creeds", there was a definite enmity to the literal translation of Genesis ch.6 for instance, as well as here in Isaiah holding to the "sethite" view which became church CREED by the 2nd century A.D. prooving.......CONCLUSIVELY......LITERAL "PRE-MEDITATED" TAMPERING with the original text transliteration to conform to church doctrinal "creed"!!!. Hey folks, don't you think Satan knows that God is "TRUTH", and wrote a book containing the truth about his adversary SATAN, written almost more about than any other topic besides.....JESUS CHRIST......, and would DEFINITELY influence every "version" if he could to detract from the light shone upon him by the LITERAL VOICES IN THE ORIGINAL LANGUAGES......THEIR LANGUAGES......GREEK & HEBREW.......LANGUAGES OF THE JEWS AND THE GENTILES ( according to the "inspired" and SCRIBED time periods of Christ's TRUE PROPHETS!!!!). All original hebrew texts of any validity has "NEPHILLIM" transcribed here in Isaiah 14 and Gen.6. I in fact find KJV only adherents to be very 'nauseating' spiritually, and conform to 99% of the statements Christ made against the pharisees & 'scribes'. Oh, and for those who would argue "TR" over Byzantium majority, the TR was in fact altered here by stephanus and Besa folks cause all other texts AGREE with the majority and is the reason why the "American Standard Version", "NIV" etc. is more correct in some of these areas then the KJV!!!. Besides, KJV only proponents are usually anti-demonology (UFO, aliens included), which is another LUDICROUS position seeing how a vast majority of the bible is written about Satan and his demonic hierarchy, than about heaven and angels! (the closer you get to the truth about the enemy, the more he denies his "existence"). Oh, the TR argument of KJV only proponents is the biggest lie of them all from this group because the Textus Receptus was not even produced  for some 14 years after the KJV!!!. Really, the truth of the matter is, all KJV only proponents are ignorant of the facts. I know this to be true because I have been there, done that , and can testify of it as fact. Those who are KJV only and go study the facts and remain KJV only are.......NOT OF TRUTH because the facts testify of the truth themselves, and cannot be avoided. Lets look at a few basic facts to begin with. What is commonly known as the Textus Receptus, which is said by KJV only proponents to be an "INSPIRED" greek text was not produced till 1624 and contains 287 variances from the text Erasmus used that produced the KJV. A text that is claimed to be "PERFECT" and inspired wasn't even used in the making of the KJV for it wasn't even called the Textus Receptus until 1624, after it had undergone some 287 revisions. Not only was Erasmus and the boys.......CATHOLIC, but the "version" was instated by King James who was the HEAD OF THE CHURCH OF ENGLAND.........THE  "CATHOLIC" COUNTERPART!!!. King James was also a FREEMASON, Lucifer worshipper ladies and gentlemen, and here is some 'official' documentation as proof . If that isn't enough if we are in a "mud slinging" fight like KJV only proponents....

"love", because "SPEAK THEY AND "USE" ONLY THINGS OF THE WORLD", then the good King James was also a HOMOSEXUAL.

        What the KJV only proponent asserts is that Jerome was "inspired" to reveal Satan's name in his Vulgate, lucifer. The KJV only cult attack the Vulgate in one hand, and uphold it in the other IN IGNORANCE because the KJV was heavily transliterated from it.......HYPOCRITES!!!. Realize ladies and gentlemen that the NIV, NASB or any other version, does not change the original intent of the passage cause were still talkin about Satan in this passage....its clear!. The word used in the greek and the hebrew still translates out to "Morning Star" and "Son of the Dawn" no matter how you slice and dice it . In fact, the NIV and NASB are "truer" to the original GREEK TEXTS for as Ive said, Lucifer......ONLY.......appears in the Vulgate, not in ANY ORIGINAL HEBREW OR EVEN GREEK TEXT AS IN THE SEPTUAGINT OF CHRIST'S TIME THOUGH MODERN "REVISIONS" USE THE WORD "LUCIFER". Is Jesus Christ "cut down", CAST DOWN TO EARTH, "fallen" folks? Did he "weaken the nations"? No, so what kind of crap are these vessels of dissension, the Riplinger's, Ruckman's, Marr's, Chick's, Jeffreys, Lindsay's etc., right down to the little backwoods, backwards shortwave false prophets in Babylon/America etc. trying to pull? THEY ARE THOSE THAT CAUSE, CREATE, INCITE DIVISION, SEPARATING THEMSELVES>>>>>"SENSUAL">>>>>>AS "BRUTE BEASTS", WHICH THING THE LORD HATES!!!. There is no "conspiracy" folks that the KJV cult claims, but there IS ONE WITH THEM FOR SURE!!!. The satanic spirit of "haughtiness", arrogance, and ELITISM is found in all the cults of christianity, and none more than the KJV cult. Just like the baptists, pentecostals, 'trinitarians', preterists, reconstructionists, rapture cultists, new wine movement etc., the cult of the KJV separates themselves SENSUAL, whose arguments are not based upon the truth and the facts, but on the things of the world, PAPER INK & TRADITION.....MAMMON & THE SPIRIT THEREOF!!!. The KJV version has over 6000 variances from the original texts. It has well over 5500 added and "deleted" words as it was transliterated into english and revised over time into MODERN ENGLISH, for no-one is walking around quoting from the ORIGINAL "AUTHORIZED" VERSION, the 'authentic' one, because the ERRORS WHICH ARE "PLETHORA", and the wording of 1611 "english" is so RAGGED and riddled, some places are un-refutibly almost un-understandable. THIS IS FACT, thus the argument of "preservation", inspiration, and PERFECTION is utterly ludicrous ladies and gentlemen for the real truth of the matter is the pure word of God is found in ALL THE "VERSIONS", though all the "versions" are transliterated and.........IMPERFECT!!!. Thus, "study to show yourself approved". The "lies" of KJV only proponents are MANY, based on tradition, mammon.....ANTICHRIST, and for all intense purposes, flat out IGNORANCE!!!. These people worship PAPER & INK, A BOOK, A "VERSION", A "TRANSLATION" FROM MANS HANDS, AN "IDOL"......NOT......THE TRUE "WORD"........WHO IS A SPIRIT!!!!. The "truth".......ALL TRUTH.....that Christ promised to bring you into is found.........EVERYWHERE........and the scriptures, the Word, the bible is the key that unlocks, unmasks, unveils the TRUTH that is veiled to the fallen human race at large.  As a matter of fact, the most hard-core of the cult will proclaim that the KJV only position is not "new", but is rather old!.........THEY SHOW THEIR FILTHY  BIAS TOWARDS TRADITIONS OPENLY and pressure you, the believer, by the "spirit of mammon"......IN JESUS CHRIST'S NAME......, in the form of PEER PRESSURE for no better example. Now, the single most controversial passage in scripture in the KJV controversy, is one touted by the cult of the KJV. They claim that the absolute test of authenticity is what is known as the Comma Johanneum in the latin, or 1 John 5:7. The KJV cult claims if a translation does not contain the "comma", it is not "orthodoxy", thus false. I have since found this to be in fact what I call the "TRINITY COMMA" CONSPIRACY, and has very little to do with "Johanine" or rather  the apostle John, but rather the 3 "SCRIBES"(trinity?) who created the textus receptus, Erasmus, Stephanus, and Besa. The passage in question states thus in the KJV...."For there are three that bear record in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost: and these three are one"....The truth of the matter ladies and gentlemen is that Erasmus first work came out in 1516........WITHOUT THIS PHRASE dubbed the Johannine Comma. It was not in  Erasmus's first and second edition of his Greek Text  for a very simple reason,

       Erasmus did not even use it in his second edition, instead, it was only to be found in the........LATIN VULGATE !!!........an early "transliteration" of the original texts, a "REVISION" into the latin language. He wrote a note in his work "Annotations", and it simply said....."In the Greek Codex, I find ONLY THIS about the threefold testimony: "because there are three 'witnesses', SPIRIT, WATER, BLOOD"....he was charged immediately after with promoting "Arianism" by his counterparts, all because he stuck with the original greek manuscripts and codex's. THIS IS THE EXACT SAME THING THE KJV CULT DOES TODAY!!!. Erasmus's rebuttal was simple....."produce me just one greek manuscript containing the Comma, and pointed out that nothing was missing from his editions"..... He promised to include the Comma in one of his editions of his work if ever a manuscript was found. He was finally constrained in his 3rd edition to include the Comma when a highly controversial codex  'suddenly appeared' out of thin air at Montfortianus, IRELAND, a 'freemasonic hotbed", having NO historical validation for ITS authenticity. It was highly suspect and was thought  to be most likely produced by the "Grey Friars", whose provincial, Henry Standish, was an enemy of Erasmus according to  many authors, scholars, and church historians. But, the church hierarchy upheld it because of one simple reason. It enforces their false, POLYTHEISTIC "TRINITY" DOCTRINE of 3......"PERSONS". Two of Erasmus's rival counterparts as scholars, "Zuniga" and "Edward Lee" were the promoters of this finding both publicly and to the upper echelon's of the Church authority, putting great strain on Erasmus to bend and submit. Erasmus did, to quell the uproar stating that he did not believe the Trinity doctrine relied solely on the Comma, and included it in his 3rd edition, a 3rd "REVISION"!!! (a typical 'catholic' attitude). It now lies at "Trinity College", Dublin. 1 John 5:7 is thee verse used by the "trinitarians" to argue their "3 person" stance, and it was because of this verse that 1 John almost didn't make it into the canon of scripture, along with a few other epistles and books such as "Hebrews" and "Revelation". The folks who talk as if their expert scholars in knowledge of the history of how the scriptures came to be, are total IGNORAMOUS'S!!!. To state that one can never understand the "Trinity" as do the "Trinitarians" when you corner them with their contradiction of absurdity,  is to say that one can NEVER KNOW OR UNDERSTAND GOD.........A LIE OUT OF HELL!!! There is a.....TRI-UNITY of God laid out and revealed in scripture, there is NOT a "trinity" in the context and creed which the apostate Church ENFORCES BRUTISHLY, which is TRI-THEISM, another form of polytheism. The two concepts are NOT THE SAME, and no this is not semantics!!!. The biblical tri-unity of God displayed in the Word is NOT the one upheld almost unilaterally in the Church. The origin and root of the "creed" and TRADITION in the Church comes from the CATHOLIC WHORE "POLYTHEISTIC" MYSTERY RELIGION........PERIOD!!!. In fact, the root creed of the Trinity is an utter HYPOCRISY according to the creedal doctrine of the catholic whore seeing how MARY IS THROWN IN THE MIX which makes catholicism conclusively POLY-THEISTIC (quadtheistic in fact seeing how "Mary" is a....."PERSON"......with a......"PERSONALITY"), which is the "mother" of the modern TRINITARIAN DOCTRINE........."3 PERSONS".... Erasmus 'surrendered' and stated in his Annotations that he included it so as to "not allow any more occasion for slander". Erasmus, his counterparts, Stephanus & Beza........CATHOLIC!!!.He also stated that the greek and latin texts vary considerably and it was very clear and indisputable, yet felt there was no danger in accepting either reading. Erasmus, a catholic, caused a ruckus when he went against another considered "inspired version"of his day, the Latin Vulgate, the "IDOL" VERSION OF THE ORIGINAL CATHOLIC FAITH. Reality is folks, there is literally no one reading the 'authentic' AUTHORIZED version, for the versions of the KJV we have now are  but REVISIONS of the "authentic" authorized version. The "Copyright" version the majority are quoting from isn't even the object of the KJV cult argument, total hypocritical liars. The majority of people are walking around quoting the 1850 "revision" of the KJV, mostly included are KJV ONLY CULTISTS!!!. If you read some documents on my website you will see the MANY, MANY ERRORS in the translation of the KJV that I point out and prove in the exegesis from the original languages which can be done with any common greek/hebrew/chaldee/aramaic concordance. The choice of ADJECTIVES and meanings in the exegesis into any of the versions was up to the translators and at there DISCRETION. Obviously.......DOCTRINE.....is the agenda of choice. The "Comma" can only be found in specific and certain latin texts as well that were used for the Vulgate. The original, first manuscripts of Johns epistle were written in GREEK. The latin was TRANSLITERATED from the original greek texts. There are.....HUNDREDS......of reasons and arguments from the original texts why the 'Comma' is and comes from a......REVISION, not the "source". There are a PLETHORA of variations between erasmus, stephanus, and besa's works which were compiled between 1536 and 1605. Stephanus's work based upon Erasmus's, and Besa in fact REVISING both Stephanus and Erasmus's work. The latin vulgate was the first complete "version" containing the old and new testaments and didn't come on scene till way after early church. The early church had the old testament in the Septuagint (O.T. into "Greek") and the Tanach, and Torah etc. THERE WAS NO NEW TESTAMENT FOR COUPLE HUNDRED YEARS LADIES AND GENTS!!!. There were over 5 "revisions" of the AV before 1660, and 13 before 1870!!!. In a tract produced in 1659, one William Kilburne claimed there were over 20,000 'errors' which crept into 6 printed editions by the 1650's. The controversy with the Kings version was prevalent way back then!!!. One of the most radical of spokesmen, or should i say SPOKESWOMEN is Gail Riplinger and her book titled New Age Bible Versions. The lies, misrepresentations, and outright malicious slanders are exactly what spirit you get from KJV only proponents. The back cover even contains a "satanic" boasting that one finds prevalent in the gnostic, BACHUS WORSHIPPING, PENTECOSTAL, CHARISMATIC, SIGNS & WONDERS MOVEMENTS:
 

      This 'spirit" folks that is prevalent everywhere in the Body of Christ is sourced upon WITCHCRAFT and is the spirit of it. Statements like this you'll find amongst all the well known false prophets on T.V., books, etc. This principle and idea of IMMINENT JUDGMENT BY GOD IS "WITCHCRAFT". Some of the utter crap I've heard by the  occultists in the Church like..."5 have lost their ability to speak"....is rampant. The entire principal of this is imminent wrath from God for going against them and their beliefs, is that "they" are the ones in control, telling God to act out their judgments. THIS IS WHAT WITCHES AND WARLOCKS DO FOLKS AND ITS CALLED TODAY IN THE CHURCH......."INTERCESSORY PRAYER". It is utter "evil" to the core and diametrically the opposite "spirit" and working of God, and "their" concept and understanding of intercessory prayer is totally OCCULTIC. I had an utter apostate, occult spiritist  false prophet recently from Oregon utter off his shortwave program a "PROPHESY" directed against me stating that "something" (he wouldn't say, the little "mousey" worm) REALLY BAD was going to happen to....moi.....in the very soon future. This was a "threat" of WRATH from God directed from this occultist, which would come "IMMINENTLY" (imminence is a false doctrine found most everywhere apostasy and heresy is found)...... This tare from the pit of hell doesn't realize that he is a WARLOCK, and did nothing less than cast a SPELL. They don't read the scripture to understand that the "wicked will do wickedly right to the end, then God will repay"...."THESE PEOPLE SIT IN THE TEMPLE OF GOD SHEWING THEMSELVES AS GOD, BELIEVING THEMSELVES TO BE GOD,"...... they are flaming witches and warlocks and don't even know it because of TRADITIONS OF MEN and their "Father". "Gail" goes on to state on the back cover of her book that the emerging New World luciferean religion is a DIRECT RESULT of these New Age Versions (which for all intensive purposes folks, is any version but the KJV). You will find this "spirit" prevalent within these witches and warlocks as can be clearly revealed in the words of miss Riplinger:
 

        Ya right Gail, me most certainly convinced AUTOMATIC WRITING through the wrong spirit for God was NOT the author of your book for %100 assurity. And by the way, to claim that know 'effort" was used by you but 'directed" by the hand of God is a tell tale sign of being TAKIN OVER BY SOME "THING", hence, how did you get the "materials" and "resources" for your convinced WILL of the same opinion STILL, did they 'materialize' for you out of thin air? What from hell is she insinuating?. She tries to cover up for her very WILLFUL "DECEPTION" of not using her full name on the book "COVER" and title to clearly avoid being revealed as a WOMEN knowing full well and proving by her deception she's "guilty" for WRITING THE BOOK IN THE FIRST PLACE and proves "conviction" of it by in this case, what she DID'NT SAY!!! Those not of the truth, do not work "truthfully". Please note she uses ELIJAH, a prophet who called "fire down from heaven in the O.T'", and that's exactly what Gail is doing in her book. Its interesting Gail, that Jesus and the apostles said that the last days false prophets and there 'minion" the ANTICHRIST, who is also known by the title LUCIFER according to Isaiah in the bogus KJV RENDITION!!! (not that the word "lucifer not valid folks because it is %100, still means Satan, your missing the point cause that's how "subtle" the liar the enemy is!!!).They go at facts and research to PROVE THEIR POSITION OR OPINION rather then find the "truth" of the matter, subsequently creating a pattern, a downspin away from ever finding the TRUTH THAT "MAKES" ONE FREE.....JESUS CHRIST!. They are the "BRUTE BEASTS" spoken of in holy writ!!!. You 'Gail' (who is gonna answer standing tall before the man!) are claiming it "inspired' DIRECTLY BY GOD, and also representing yourself ever so subtily as a "prophet", even comparing to one of the prophets of the bible, and SHEWING "MARKS", "SIGNS", "MIRACLES", and proclaiming them. Sure signs of the exact ANTICHRIST, FALSE PROPHET spirit she thinks shes "contending" against, shes guilty.....HYPOCRITE-TESS AND LIAR!!!. Her lying slanders and misrepresentations of the people on the NIV committee are of the antichrist spirit of the age!!!. Direct misquotations are found riddled through her book like against Dr. Palmer of the NIV committee:
 

       Though Mr. Palmer is  "tri-theist" oriented in his views like Gail Riplinger and the VAST MAJORITY, his statement above is %100 CORRECT concerning the "order" as revealed in scripture (not the 3 "persons" crap) and would in fact be refuted very little by those who would claim against christian orthodoxy on subject as upheld, yet Riplinger maliciously taints Palmer "occultic" via the old guilty by association technic, though an out and out malicious LIE!!!. In a discussion on the subject of the "incarnation" of Christ, Palmer stated plainly that the Holy Spirit was the cause of the "conception" of Christ into FLESH, and was only through the act of the Holy Spirit quoting John 1:14. Gail Riplinger is an out and out LIAR and the spirit behind this CULT is so full of GUILE it wants to make me puke!!!. This cult and spirit of KJV onlyism is recognized and discerned throughout all the church now, even the other cults. For example, the young lady whom I used the above JPEGS for King James from her site( and thank and give her credit for), clearly recognizes the KJV cult, but leans on  catholic works, claims the Holy Spirit is 'wisdom" in the bible (sophia cult of first century gnosticism), and that she was "born-again" by said Holy Spirit...... "wisdom" (and literally inferred a MANIFESTATION in her "testimony"), who as she states must be the.....MOTHER-GOD!!!. This folks is Luciferean, first century Gnostic, soon after MARY MYSTERY RELIGION CATHOLIC WHORE DOCTRINE, and  the crowning doctrine of the faith, the Athanaius/Apostles Creed doctrine of the {sic} TRINITY instated circa 325 a.d.,  being the CENTRAL doctrine of the faith as quoted in creed!!!. Yet this young lady who though utterly "decieved" in areas, SEES totally the antichrist spirit and CULT of the KJV only proponents and even proclaims it loudly on her web site (I need not mention her name or website to cause her reproach, though I want to make it perfectly clear, "WOMEN" and the jezebel spirit in the Church is a pervading force right today and it "grows" steadily and subtly like a serpent). Now, as stated earlier, the 'cornerstone' behind the KJV only cult is their insistence on the purity of the Textus Receptus, not willing to acknowledge the total "impurities" found in it. Their is not "one" TR, but MANY ,and in fact, the one quoted from today is not even the original......REVISIONS!!!. Here's a short list of the INTENDED CHANGES and variations in the TR:

       Thus, we see that in the very "INSPIRED RECEIVED TEXT......OF THE "PEOPLE" ( This is what "Textus Receptus" means, and is democracy run amuk, 'mob rules') that this cult proclaims is "perfect", has mans mitts involved everywhere throughout, making the cult out to be total hypocritical LIARS of the first order. Any radical, extremist anti-rapturists (like the luciferean from Oregon I mentioned earlier), BETTER  take note of the variation and actual FACT of Luke 17:36, cause your ignorance and 'spirit' is showing!!!. take careful notice of the influence of the Vulgate on the very text the KJV was based upon and no surprise, though they claim the TR is the "text of the reformation", its about as unreformed from the catholic whore and its 'inspired version', the Vulgate, as hitler was when lead filled his head!!!. Calvin turned against the TR position eventually, and pointed out some grievous variances himself, and eventually sided with Erasmus's initial position!!!. KJV only adherents are extremely hostile to the Septuagint, and this should be noted for a reason because the Septuagint is hostile against the Vulgate rendering of the O.T., and as ive shown in another document, there was a definite CONSPIRACY in the rendering of certain scriptures pertaining to NEPHILLIM and the sons of Seth controversy, which started at the beginning of the Church age, perhaps before. The Septuagint was around some 250 YEARS BEFORE CHRIST'S BIRTH AND WAS AROUND AND KNOWN BY JESUS CHRIST when he walked the earth 2000 years ago!!!!. The Latin Vulgate was written hundreds of years later. Ive read Riplingers book of lying "trash" to create dissension in the spirit of elitist, apostate ANTICHRIST!!!. In her book, she mis-spelled a couple of names of people she quoted from and it was pointed out to her. She quoted later that she..."relunctantly fixed the mistakes in her later printings as the two men involved advocated removing the name of the deity from the bible about 200 times".....She even accused these two men of being 'occultists' later on because of HER dislike of their textual choices. (these two men removed NOTHING, but relied on the original texts like Erasmus) This 'I am the judge of God and will execute it for him' spirit is SATANIC, and flee from it. Miss Riplinger, Ruckman, and all the other APOSTATE workers of iniquity contemporaries of them in spirit and deed had better REPENT and do it quick, cause the real judge standeth at the door!!!. The other "versions" were just as INSPIRED if we are gonna give "true" accreditation of Gods word. Without analyzing Ruckman too much for its pathetic, this guy is documented everywhere in print making ludicrous hypocrisies and contradictions, even denying the very statements he made to start his perverted little movement!!!. Their are MANY with this tare (Fuller Bible institute for an example). HYPOCRISY is the tell-tale sign of the workers of iniquity, and Christ hated and still does, nothing more than HYPOCRITES, believe me!!!. There is no truth "IN" them. Here's a statement from this totally apostate WOLF and DESTROYER that causeth (in the KJV spirit for Petee and his crowd) dissension among the brethren.

        There you have it, right out of his mouth. Do you not see the spirit of 'wickedness' in this statement? then you are blind for I see "many" in this statement including the "idol" of mammon.....MONEY!!!. Ruckman, out of his own mouth "confesses" that he WORSHIPS the KJV as.........JESUS CHRIST, saying that the KJV is the "absolute standard" of TRUTH!!!. Jesus Christ isn't paper or ink, or a version, or translation, but a very real, very angry GOD with a rather large group of sinners in his hand and true judgment WILL come when .......HE........is damn well ready!!!. This evil wolf, Ruckman, is considered the "grand-daddy" of the KJV only movement and whether they like it or not, KJV only folks got Petee's 'spirit" all over them and it stinks. Well, its not Petee's, but LUCY'S, and they better repent. The KJV only cultist, worshipping his little "version", never ever sits down to read the preface of the King James Bible, any one of the modern revisions to see what the translators had to say about the 'translators'.

            This statement is a flat out LIE as has been proven since the Vulgate was heavily leaned on and is a documented fact. This statement is a lie in reference to the original KJV translators, but is not in reference to "WHERE" the truth actually lies in where the pure word of God is. Now to get back one last time to the "Ruckmanite", Peter S. Ruckman, and to show that LIES and HYPOCRISY are everywhere to be found, by the proponents, and the arguments of the cult of the KJV:
 

            Oh man, Ruckman, you are a total HYPOCRITE, LIAR, and inciter of derision. Ive only centered out Ruckman and Riplinger seeing how they are two of the more "extremists" in the KJV cult and very well known, but i could incite quote after quote of hypocrisy, lies, outright slanderous attacks against the REAL truth from all the well known false prophets of Babylon down too, that's right, the backwoods backwards shortwave cultist out there birthing his own little movement (there are MANY). Ive taken a very meticulous look at this whole controversy and have found that every last single argument used by the KJV only cult is a flat out LIE......EVERY LAST ONE OF THEM. There is not one argument and point by them that cannot be solidly refuted into the dust, yet the TRUTH falls on dead ears, and the sheeple follow the tares. There are a plethora of websites, books, and bible scholars out there debunking the KJV cult into the ground, yet the MOB RULES for this little "cult" is fully penetrated into the highest levels of the Church, and has the gravest of influences on the Body. KJV ONLYISM IS "IDOLTRY".....PERIOD!!!. KJV "onlyism" is the worship of THE PEOPLE and "their" preferred choice of paper and ink. The very name "textus receptus' was coined by the Elzever brothers, Bonaventure and Matthew, some 2 decades AFTER the publication of the KJV and in their second edition preface claimed that...."THIS text is the text NOW received by all"....which was written in LATIN as "textum....ab omnibus receptum" from which came the phrase TEXTUS RECEPTUS or the RECEIVED TEXT (or rather the "accepted" text of the people). This very name FORGES Gods stamp of approval in insinuation and reality, it is a THEFT by brute force to......SUBVERT AND CONTROL THE WORD OF GOD........MOB RULES LAODECIA!!!. Here's a very good comparison chart done by James White in the vein of Riplinger, to show you the difference of 'deception' in translation clarity when dealing with the DEITY of Jesus Christ.

        The fact of the matter is folks, the KJV is the least clear of the 3 translations exampled above on key verses dealing with the deity of Christ, the exact opposite of the claim the KJV cult proposes. Some of these verses in the chart above are extremely important, and the authentic believer walking the narrow way, knows what I mean. There is the argument that the name "Jesus Christ" has been removed from the other versions in over some 200 instances by the Gail Riplingers, and Ruckmans of the world, but only IGNORANCE of the facts would give this conclusion. The fact of the matter is, the original texts vary greatly in said places, but the use or non use of name in comparison to the KJV is totally irrelevant, for you will find that it is the KJV that is in question in those areas according to the original texts, and it was the translators of the KJV who took liberties. A study of the original alephs and codex's for oneself will prove this to you. The standard by which the KJV was translated, was theLATIN VULGATE ladies and gentlemen, and not the original greek and hebrew texts. If the Vulgate did not validate it, it was NOT!!!. The real truth of the matter is, the KJV only cultist is not arguing that the newer versions are against the "deity" of Christ, but against the "established" doctrine of the TRINITY upheld by the Church, imposed by the catholic whore hundreds of years ago. I have found that all said verses  in question by the cult against the newer versions, are exclusive to the KJV, and they are dealing with the "Trinity", and the "Comma"(1 John 5:7) is the BASIS!!!. The more  i studied this controversy folks, the more I was drawn to the conclusion that the claim of a satanic conspiracy with "new versions" (which the KJV is!!!), is with the KJV and not the newer versions!!!. Now, i'm gonna tear a new '---hole' in the KJV cult with this next bit of documentation. Well now, for those of you who are not up to date or have not done your homework, ill tell you. Sir Francis Bacon ladies and gentlemen, was a GRAND MASTER "ROSICRUCIAN"

......, earlier counterpart to 'speculative freemasonry'. He was a close associate of the masonic/illuminated/homosexual King James, and he had his filthy mitts on the original KJV manuscripts for 1 YEAR on the orders of the good King , his 'luciferean' liege!!!. One year for....CHECKING, "CORRECTING", and REVISING because of Bacon's 'intellectual and philosophical' expertise!!!. Now, how many of the freaks of spiritual nature out there still claim the KJV pure and "inspired"?. This above plate is found in a book titled "The Mystery of Francis Bacon" by William T. Smedley, published in 1910 . This can be confirmed by scores of other works including 'A Christian Rosenkreutz Anthology" by Paul M. Allen. The very first edition of the KJV was filled with rosicrucian symbols in its pages, signatures of the 'mysteries'. Many, many scholars have since been convinced that Francis Bacon is the author of the works of Shakespeare, and that said Shakespeare was a mythical personage, a pen name for the "ghost" writer Francis Bacon. My own research seems to validate this fact to a great extent (I am blessed to be in the possession of some pretty rare books and documents from many years of collection). John Robison who wrote "Proofs Of A Conspiracy" in the 1700's proves Francis Bacons luciferean connection, giving a "list" of historical Grand Masters of THE CRAFT right out of Adam Weishaupts Illuminati writings!!!. Most folks don't realize that the 'world changers' like DA VINCI, MOZART, SIR ISAAC NEWTON, ELIAS ASHMOLE, ROBERT FLUDD, JACOB BOEHME, VOLTAIRE, BEETHOVEN, etc., were all Luciferean "grand masters" of the "ancient mystery religions", in particular "rosicrucianism". This is all documented folks, and old news!!!. I've in fact come up with a "NEW" (keeping in the 'spirit' of the false prophets) rendition of the abreviation.....NIV.......to the vial "evil eye" of the cultists, the Neutral Iniquity Version, because in fact ladies and gentlemen, in the attack against the NIV, it to my scrutiny is NOT 'guilty" of the charges against it, and the more I compared to the KJV and its "background", and to original texts of WHAT COUNTS, the more the KJV failed....MISERABLY!!!. Im not lauding the NIV over the KJV, I don't see ANY "version" better than the other.....they ALL fail THAT kind of "fleshy judgment", but they ALL are inspired and contain the WORD OF GOD!!!. I can point out literal and blatant "PERVERSION" of translation through "revision" in ALL OF THEM!!!. Listen to this closely.... I AM THE LORD THY GOD AND I CHANGE "NOT", AND IF I DID, IT WAS "WRITTEN" IN MY WORD BY MY PROPHETS AND SCRIBES.....FOR YOU!!!!. The "scriptures" testify this statement above to be true, the scriptures are the WORD, the "word" is JESUS CHRIST, and the "word" is GOD!. Now, to get the "traditionalists" (fundamentalists) really mad, lets talk about MARTIN LUTHER, and his 'secret society' connections folks. Have you not seen Martin's ROSICRUCIAN SEAL used on his writings?. That's right, Mr. Luther could and very well may have been a Rosicrucian, which makes perfect sense if one understands church history, and the HEGELLIAN DIALECTIC. A perfect "breaking away" to appease the other catholic entity, the Church Of England and british freemasonry!!!. The catholic churches answer to the "reformation" was the creation of the Order Of The Jesuits, to undermine the 'heresies' promulgated by the Lutheran doctrine. The "ROSE" and "CROSS" used together is the primary "DEVICE" used on all rosicrucian works. It is also incorporated with the HEART, which is even found in the secret "catholic" freemason lodges (Immaculate Heart, Opus Dei etc.). The symbol identified the Rosicrucians, or rather......ESOTERIC, "MASONIC", CHRISTIANITY. Folks need to do a study on Martin Luther, his background is very interesting, and in many places according to the historic record....mysterious. This is not new folks, there's a few books out there exposing Martin Luthers connections to the secret societies (see William Bramleys "Gods Of Eden"). Martin Luther's connection to Francis Bacon is evident historically, whom Bacon even began to enforce the "new"  movement of Luther's. Now, as I have said before, the KJV is fraught with blatant 'liberties' and even based upon "church tradition", most heavily the 'catholic' doctrine of the Trinity......3 PERSONS!!!. The other 'versions" in fact stay truer to the original greek texts. There are some very blatant, and questionable verses "TRANSLATED" in the KJV, that tend to lead one to believe that there was an secret ulterior motive, and the modern apostate movements within the church testify of it. The trinitarian creed and doctrine upheld today does exactly what the apostles prophesied of, and what Christ claimed about.....THE WAY!!!. It , the modern trinity doctrine and belief removes the "EXCLUSIVITY" OF JESUS CHRIST!!!.

 

        Now, I could draw a chart with many more examples folks, but these few here demonstrate the complete error of the KJV in very important places. the other 'versions" the KJV only advocates like to smite upon are in fact 'correct" in these places above according to the majority of the original texts. Ive used thes ones for they have doctrinally tendencies towards some of the heretical doctrines upheld today such as the FALSE GOSPEL OF "BELIEF ALONE", THE TRINITARIAN CULT OF 3 "PERSONS" (tri-theism) etc. There are many additions to the KJV including the ending of Mark, and certain other verses like Acts 9:5 (kick against the pricks) that have little or no solid background as to text origin. What can be seen above though totally annihilates the KJV only argument against "deity of christ", and in fact, bolsters a UNBIBLICAL FOUNDATION for the upheld concept of the "Trinity"(3 persons) in the KJV......"only"......I may add, when one enters the "Comma" conspiracy into the fray. And as I stated earlier, on a argument to arguement basis against the KJV accusations, the KJV only camp in fact FAILS in every instance when one looks at the facts for themselves. I in fact challenge anyone to look at all the facts for oneself, in the.......spirit of truth.....and show me where the KJV is "superior" in any one instance concerning their arguments against the other versions. I want to remind you once again, in no way am I trying to uphold the other versions and eliminate the KJV, for I could do the same thing with the other versions. In fact, in some of the verses above, other phrases and words are in 'error" with the other versions in comparison to the KJV!!!. I am just trying to show, that the KJV only movement is nothing but a CULT empowered by the spirit of mammon, fueled by doctrines and traditions of men. And, truth is, the more I show the 'errors" of the KJV, the more it seems there is a conspiracy with it!!!. When one considers that the BIBLE that is AUTHORIZED by the.......SUPREME LODGE OF FREEMASONRY......is the King James Version, and that ALL the MASONIC Presidents for the last few hundred years have been sworn in by it, something definitely STINKS!!!. No, the freemasonic "Holy Bible" is not some special book, but a common KJV translation with an added masonic "preface". Hmm, 33rd degree LUCIFEREANS taking an oath on a book that is supposed to uphold the "deity" of their ENEMY, Jesus Christ!!!. Why would a "luciferean" support and allow something that he's supposed to be "negating"?. Could it be the subtle enforcement of the 'lucifereans' TRINITY in the KJV, which they had a hand in, through the whore catholic church?. The GNOSTIC BASED CONCEPT OF 3 SEPARATE "PERSONS" WITH DIFFERENT LEVELS OF AUTHORITY IN WHAT IS KNOWN AS "THE GODHEAD"? (exclusive to the...you guessed it, the KJV!!!). Freemasons don't worship "another" God, they worship "other" GODS (plural)!!!. This is POLYTHEISM folks, exactly what Satan wants!!!. The modern concept of the "Trinity " NEGATES THE "EXCLUSIVITY" OF JESUS CHRIST!!!. There is no basis to any of the claims and arguments of the KJV cult, and they in fact look like total HYPOCRITES in their judgments and 'spirit'. KJV onlyism is both "idolatrous" and "pharisetical", in the spirit of the SCRIBES!!!. The movement by its very nature in fact DENIES THE LORD WHO BOUGHT THEM seeing he is become nothing more than ink & paper enforced by tradition and men, A "VERSION" OF THE "ORIGINAL", WHO IS A "SPIRIT"!!!. As stated earlier, there are many good books out there that expose this 'cult'. For an excellent, very complete and un-biased look at the KJV only controversy, I suggest James R. Whites "The King James Only Controversy". It totally makes a mockery of the KJV only cult and utterly destroys all arguments based upon the FACTS!!!. The fact is, at the end of the day, the "cult" is just that, a CULT......don't get caught  in it cause its "deadly"!!!!.